Skip to main content

Featured

Apple to take a $900M tariff hit?

 During Apple’s second-quarter earnings call on Thursday, CEO Tim Cook finally broke the silence on how President Trump’s tariffs are affecting the company. The short answer? Not too badly—at least for now. Apple CEO Tim Cook and US President Donald Trump Cook told investors that Apple only felt a “limited impact” from the tariffs during the March quarter. As for what lies ahead, he admitted it’s hard to predict. But if everything stays the same globally, Apple expects the tariffs to add about $900 million to its expenses in the third quarter. That number actually came as a bit of a relief to investors. One even called it a “pretty good outcome,” considering all the uncertainty swirling around U.S. trade policy lately. Still, there's some nervousness about what the coming months might bring if policies shift again. Cook clarified that this $900 million figure is only valid if there are no changes to the current tariff landscape—no new duties, no surprises. And he emphasized th...

Google could break-up soon?

Many view Google primarily as a search engine company, its core strength actually lies in advertising—it’s the largest ad business in the world. That’s why the ongoing antitrust case targeting Google’s advertising technology may ultimately have a broader impact than earlier legal actions involving its search engine or mobile platforms. A recent court ruling went against Google, and both sides are now preparing to propose remedies in a follow-up trial scheduled for later this year.

At a hearing today, US District Judge Leonie Brinkema set the trial date for September 22. Like in the prior search-related lawsuit, the Department of Justice (DOJ) aims to dismantle certain parts of Google’s operations to restore competitive balance. The DOJ wants Google to divest two key segments of its advertising ecosystem: the ad exchange platform, which facilitates global bidding for ad placements, and the publisher ad server, a tool used by websites to manage and display ads.

Though the court sided with the DOJ on liability, it didn’t support claims that Google’s past acquisitions of ad networks like DoubleClick and Admeld harmed market competition—meaning those assets will remain with Google for now.

The DOJ's proposed remedy would roll out in stages, starting with a mandate that Google share real-time bidding data with external partners. Google opposes this, arguing it would require building entirely new systems and releasing them as open-source tools—something it deems impractical.

The second phase of the remedy involves Google divesting its ad exchange and publisher server platforms—an idea the company also resists.

According to Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google's VP of regulatory affairs, "The DOJ's push to force divestitures far exceeds what the court found, lacks legal support, and would ultimately hurt advertisers and publishers."

In its defense, Google is likely to argue that the DOJ's remedy is excessive and unrealistic, pointing out that few entities could afford or operate these massive platforms. Estimates last year valued Google’s ad business at around $95 billion—potentially too large to break apart. Still, Google had similar doubts about the sale of Chrome, and during the search-related trial, multiple companies expressed interest in acquiring the browser.

Comments

Popular Posts